Monday, December 29, 2008

Venus


At dusk on December 28th, 2008, you can not help but look into the southwestern sky and see the evening star known as Venus. Venus, our 2nd planet from the sun is one of four terrestrial or rocky planets. Venus is the closest planet to Earth at its nearest approach of 45 million km. Venus is about 108 million km from the sun and is about the size of Earth.

The photo above is unfortunately my best effort so far. This image was the best exposure after several attempts of shooting 10 exposures or more and trying to stack them into a decent picture. This particular image was taken using a 10mm eyepiece. The problems are many: Poor atmospheric conditions and more likely, Venus is reflecting too much light from the sun back to my 10" mirror, thus causing an aberration or star burst effect. After reading further, I am under the impression, much like Mercury, Venus is best viewed and photographed at dusk or even before dusk while there is still light out. I will attempt to photograph Venus again under better conditions. A planetary filter may help the situation as well.

The view of Venus through a 10mm eyepiece is better than what was photographed. Much like our moon, Venus also exhibits phases based on the sun and our geometrical view. During this viewing, Venus was a visible half crescent. Because Venus is so bright, one can not make out any distinguishing features other than a cream color.

I look forward to visiting this planet again and with more knowledge in hand, achieve better photographic results.

Uranus

Last night I visited our 7th planet from the sun: Uranus. On the evening of December 28th, 2008 at approx. 9:00pm CST under clear skies (temp 24 degrees with calm winds), I looked to the southwest and found the brightest star near the horizon which is Cetus. Then I worked my way west along the horizon into the constellation Aquarius. From the naked eye, Uranus is barely visible at about 5.7 magnitude. It would appear as a bluish star - really no different from the other stars near the western horizon. Once I found the general area star charts placed Uranus, I began probing the search area with a 25mm lense scanning back and forth. Uranus is discernible as a small greenish disc with a 25mm eyepiece, though it took several times to confirm by comparing it to neighboring stars. No matter how close a star may be to Earth (whether 2.5 light years or 2.5 million light years), a star will still appear only as a pin point of light. Thus, planets like Uranus and Neptune will actually appears as discs once ample magnification is achieved. I boosted the magnification to 5mm and could clearly make out a bluish green fuzzy disc. It was best viewed with a 10mm eyepiece and could be resolved as a planetary disc about three times the diameter of neighboring stars.

A treat indeed, as Uranus sits about 3 billion km from the Sun. Uranus revolves around the Sun once every 84 Earth years. Uranus's mass is roughly 14.5 times that of the Earth, making it the least massive of the giant planets. I was unable to make out any distinguishing characteristics like cloud patterns, ring systems or moons. Never the less, it was a rewarding find; especially being that it was only discovered in 1690 and was thought to be a star. In the future, I will attempt to photograph this planet.

Thursday, December 25, 2008

NGC 2169

An otherwise ordinary open cluster in Orion, I viewed this deep space object on December 17th, 2008 at 8:00pm cst. The worthy note was that the temperature was sitting at about 5 degrees. With snow on the ground and Christmas lights causing more than normal light pollution, this was my best observational effort; Too cold, and too bright on this night. NGC 2169 is a small distinct open cluster best viewed through a 10mm lense.

Sunday, December 7, 2008

M44 Beehive Cluster

On December 6th, 2008 between 11:00pm-11:45pm CST I made the following observations: The evening was clear and cold. Winds at 5-10 mph with a temperature of approx. 10 degrees. With a waxing gibbous moon at 68% full and snow on the ground, I viewed M44 the Beehive Open Cluster in Cancer. There is nothing exciting about this 4.0 magnitude object - about 500 light years away, it is comprised of approx. 40 stars. It looks more like a swarm of bees than a beehive.

I also viewed M41, another open cluster in Canis Major, about 2400 light years away. Used 12 Canis Majoris as a reference star. Also viewed the M67 Open Cluster in Cancer, a 7.5 magnitude object. M79 was a Globular Cluster in Lepus. Difficult to find at 8.5 magnitude, this object is about 54,000 light years away. I used HIP25273 and TYC6475-187-1 as reference stars. M79 can be best described as a faint fuzzy sphere using a 10mm eye piece. Even though sometimes dull to the eye, Globular Clusters tend to be more exciting to view than the more common Open Clusters.

I also viewed NGC 2266 in Gemini, an open cluster that was difficult to discern. I would have cataloged more NGC objects, but it was too cold.

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

Convergence

Well, unfortunately, the recent solar system convergence of Venus, Jupiter and the moon was a bust for Chicagoland star gazers. On the evening of December 1st, 2008 it was overcast and thus a missed opportunity. The next such alignment I believe is in 2052. Even still, one can look up into the southern sky at dusk and see Venus and Jupiter sitting very close together for the next week or so. Still, a rather impressive sight.

It reminds me of June 16th, 1991 when at 10:51pm PST in San Juan Capistrano, CA I viewed a impressive convergence of Mars, Venus and Jupiter making a rare triangle in the night sky. Then, less than a month later on July 11th, 1991 we were treated to a 70% solar eclipse viewed also in San Juan Capistrano, CA at 11:41am PST. These can be considered my first documented observations and preceded my formal education in Astronomy which included several classes at the college level including Intro to Astronomy, Advanced Astronomy and an additional Astronomy Lab at Saddleback College in Mission Viejo, CA. I guess you could say I have been hooked ever since.

Friday, November 28, 2008

M77

On Thanksgiving Evening (11/27/08) I observed the night sky for several hours into midnight. The wind was mostly calm with clear sky's and temperatures ranged in the mid to upper 20s. It was a dryer night which means the moisture from my frozen breath was not caking onto the telescope like the night before.

The highlight of the evening was M77, a Seyfert galaxy which means bright nucleus. At 10.50 magnitude, this object was difficult to find at first due to suburban light pollution. Once found, I made out the round dim sphere and the brighter nucleus in the center. I look forward to viewing this object again on a darker night.

I also viewed M46, a dim but massive open cluster. M47 and M48 were less spectacular but visible open clusters near Monoceros. M50 was another loose, open cluster near Monceros. Monoceros is a lesser known constellation near Orion just above Canis Major in the southeastern night sky.

I also viewed NGC 1647 and NGC 1817 in Taurus. Then NGC 2129 in Gemini and NGC 1907 in Auriga - all open clusters in the Fall night sky.

Thursday, November 27, 2008

NGC 752

NGC 752 is my first deep space "Non-Messier" object to be cataloged. The NGC stands for New General Catalog and contains thousands of objects as does the IC catalog which stands for Index Catalog. For the record, the Messier Catalog contains only 110 objects but tends to be the brightest objects in the Northern Hemisphere.

NGC 752 is a massive open cluster in Andromeda. Viewed 11/26/08 around 10:00pm CST with clear skies and temperatures hovering around 24 degrees. The cluster was so expansive, I used a 45mm eye piece to enjoy its vastness. Noted several bright stars within the mix as HIP9001 and better known 56 Andromedae.

In the coming months I will continue to record all the Messier objects as well as NGC and IC objects when applicable.

Fall Open Cluster's

Last night on November 26th, 2008 I enjoyed very clear sky's here in Port Barrington, IL. The wind was calm but it was cold - The temperature that night dropped to 15 degrees. My Telescope was covered with frost and I had some difficulty keeping my view finder and eye pieces from frosting up even during short viewing instances. Last nights theme was Open Clusters, and there are plenty on a late November night.

I enjoyed M34, an open cluster near Perseus. I was able to map out several stars afterwards including a twin pair: TYC2853-22-1 and TYC2853-69-1. Undetermined if they are considered a true binary system, yet both in relation to my view through a 25mm eye piece, they seemed to be twin companions. Using a 25mm eye piece I enjoyed the grouping of M36, a cluster in Auriga that is 4100 light years away, M37, a dim massive star cluster, 4600 light years away. I also enjoyed M38, a nice open cluster that at times resembled a cross of sorts in the light polluted sky ( all grouped in Auriga), 4200 light years away.

M39 was found near Lacerta, a very loose cluster of stars. Another open cluster was found in Cassiopeia: M52, a nice looking cluster of stars. I used the stars bordering this messier object for reference: HIP115218 and HIP115691. I also visited M35 near Gemini, a large open cluster 2800 light years away. I found star 5 Gerindrum as a good reference point for M35. I found that most open clusters are best viewed with a 25mm eye piece which allows one to view a brighter reference star for hopping to the intended object.

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

The Origin of the Cosmos


It is only a matter of time before those interested or totally enthralled in Astronomy ask questions about the origin of the Cosmos. And nearly every time, religion gets intertwined into the discussion – a sometimes very heated discussion.

I wanted to keep this blog clear and concise, free of philosophy and dogma (I already contribute to another blog along those lines). My goal for the Celestial Chronicle was simple: A collection of personal astronomical observations, a record of scientific musings about the Universe as seen through my own eyes. Yet, thinking about where we come from and whether or not God created the Universe is a journey in observation itself. The origins of life are one of the grandest equations one could attempt to solve. With an open mind we must learn from both scripture and lore, coupled with understanding the most current scientific laws and theories. Ignorance is our biggest enemy and living with an open mind is our friend.

Western Christian biblical references Psalm 93:1, Psalm 96:10, and 1 Chronicles 16:30 include (depending on translation) text stating that "the world is firmly established, it cannot be moved." In the same tradition, Psalm 104:5 says, "the LORD set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved." Further, Ecclesiastes 1:5 states that "And the sun rises and sets and returns to its place, etc." The Vatican accepted the Ptolemaic view of the Earth as the center of the Universe for over two thousand years. So it is rather clear that the European Church and State weighed in on such ideas early on. Galileo Galilei, a famous astronomer in the 1600s, defended heliocentrism, and claimed it was not contrary to those Scripture passages. In regard to Scripture, he warned not to take every passage literally, particularly when the scripture in question is a book of poetry and songs, not a book of instructions or history. Galileo is just one of a handful of new age scientists famous for questioning the scientific authority of the church – a heated debate that raged for hundreds of years. On October 31st, 1992, Pope John Paul II expressed regret for how the Galileo affair was handled, and officially conceded that the Earth was not stationary, as the result of a study conducted by the Pontifical Council for Culture 350 years later!

It is clear now, that the Earth is not the center of the universe or even our own solar system. What is also clear is that our world was not made in 7 days. Yes the idea of seven days could be construed as an analogy for a longer period of time. Yet, based on the chronology of Genesis, that would mean that the Dinosaurs did not exist millions of years ago? Clearly fossil records prove otherwise. As you add up all of the dates, and accepting that Jesus Christ, the Son of God, came to Earth almost 2000 years ago, we come to the conclusion that the creation of the Earth and animals (including the dinosaurs) occurred only thousands of years ago (perhaps only 6000), not millions of years. Thus, if the Bible is right, dinosaurs must have lived within the past thousands of years with Humans? Clearly carbon dating, a proven science for determining the approximate age of a carbon based object like a fossil, proves otherwise. In fact, current science notes that the Earth is approximately 4 to 4.5 Billion years old. That is a huge spread as well and clearly science is still a young and expanding offering. Yet, it is amazing to me that we are still debating the Bible as if it were a piece of scientific literature that weighs in on the theories of Quantum Physics. Clearly, I am one of many to blame. We have come along way in understanding, but we have a long way to go.
What we do know is that the Universe is expanding. This has been proven by Red Shift and the Doppler Effect. Other Stars and Galaxies are moving outward from some undetermined center point. Also, we understand that the basic building blocks of life are Carbon, Hydrogen, Nitrogen, even Methanimine among other simple atoms and molecules. These sub-micron particles are the building blocks of life and are the main composition of Stars and all that exists in the Universe in its most rudimentary form. In the right environment coupled with a form of energy (I.E. lightning) which is also found in the Cosmos, life in the simplest form can spring forth. We have already made basic amino acids in a laboratory setting using basic cosmic ingredients including Hydrogen and a little energy in the form of electricity or lightning. Though basic, we have already created life as it may have flourished billions of years ago on Earth. Evolution, though still a theory does give very good evidence that we have evolved for Billions of years into the humans we are today. And we are still evolving!

Sure science is not perfect. Science has a large learning curve and it is certainly not cut and dry. We are continually updating theories and debunking others with new understanding. There are plenty of missing links in the evolution pattern and in general our combined knowledge of the universe. In regard to knowledge and understanding, look how far we have come since Galileo. Imagine how far science will progress the next 400 years.

The Universe is defined as everything that physically exists: the entirety of space and time, all forms of matter, energy and momentum, and the physical laws and constants that govern them. What ever was or is the source of the Universe is the answer to God – something humans can barely grasp. It will be well beyond my life that science and or faith can prove without a doubt the working mechanics of the Universe. We may never fully comprehend the entire picture. The immensity of the Cosmos points to the possibility of other life out there – possibly more intelligent life that could in turn find us. Possibly educate us? In the Universe, whether designed or not, Earth is incredibly unique. Just looking up into the stars at night, makes one wonder and amazed and you cant help feeling special. I know I do….

Sources from: From Wikipedia

Monday, November 24, 2008

Plato

"Astronomy compels the soul to look upwards and leads us from this world to another."

Plato 428-348 BC

Sunday, November 23, 2008

Globular Clusters

Also on November 21, 2008 I enjoyed two wonderful Globular Clusters. In clear but windy conditions with the temperature balmy at 56 degrees, I viewed M2 near Aquaruis: a dusty dim sphere - though spectacular being that is was clear so many distant stars made up this object (approx. 100 stars viewable). At magnitude 7.5, the central cluster could not be resolved.

I also visited the Globular Cluster M15 in Pegasus. Also with a magnitude of 7.5, but I found this cluster much more visible. Though I still could not resolve the center of the object, there were many bright stars toward the radial edge that could be independently distinguished.

Saturday, November 22, 2008

The Orion Nebula

On November 21st I enjoyed the The Orion Nebula. Known as M42 and M43, this was a spectacular Messier object - a massive nebulous dust cloud in the "sword" area near Orion's belt. There resides M42 the primary object and also M43 another nebula that is only separated by barely distinguishable dark lines or streaks. Both objects are 1000 light years away. Within M42 were four small stars - new stars I would imagine still possibly being formed. Using a 10mm eye piece, the combined nebula's filled the entire field of view. According to star maps and software like "Starry Nights", it appears there is a more distinguishable gap between objects. Due to the light pollution that night, I could barely make them out as different, independent objects. I look forward to viewing this again on a darker night.

Saturday, November 8, 2008

The Moon


The Moon is of course Earths only satellite and it is surprising to know that the moon is the 5th largest satellite in the Solar System. The average distance from the Earth to the Moon is 384,403 km, about thirty times the diameter of the Earth. The Moon's diameter is 3,474 km, a little more than a quarter that of the Earth. This image was taken using a 10mm eyepiece during the waxing crescent phase on the evening of November 3rd, 2008. In future notes, I will attempt to photograph and record more data pertaining to surface detail including craters and plains.

Galilean Satellites



Date: 11/03/08
Time: 5:45-6:30pm CST
Weather: Partly Cloudy with 5-10 mph winds - Temp: 56 (F)
Location: Port Barrington, IL

This was the placement of Jupiter's Galilean Moons on the evening of November 3rd, 2008. The four moons were discovered sometime between 1609 and 1610 by Galileo using a primitive telescope. The moons pictured above are as follows (as seen through the eyepiece left to right): Ganymede, Europa, then the planet Jupiter followed by Io and Callisto. This image was taken using a 10mm eyepiece. There was some manipulation of the image including stacking to bring out the brightness of the satellites. Though it is difficult, hopefully you can make out the moons in this image. They were visible on the source file but have become more elusive once imported into blog interface. In future notes, I will offer better images with less light pollution which may have been a contributing factor.
From multiple nightly observations, you can tell that not only does Jupiter rotate but the moons move very actively around the giant planet and can even cause eclipses and shadows on a regular basis. A great tool is http://www.shallowsky.com/jupiter.html which allows you to enter your viewing time into a basic interface and observe the moon placements at any given time. In all, Jupiter has 63 moons.
Some info provided by Wikipedia

Friday, November 7, 2008

Jupiter

Date: 11/03/08
Time: 5:45-6:30pm CST
Weather: Partly Cloudy with 5-10 mph winds - Temp: 56 (F)
Location: Port Barrington, IL

Just after dusk in the midwest, our 5th and largest planet in the solar system is visible in the southern sky during the Fall. Jupiter is one of the four gas giants which means it is not primarily composed of solid matter. As mentioned, it is the largest planet in the Solar System, having a diameter of 142,984 km. Jupiter's density, 1.326 g/cm³, is the second highest of the gas giant planets, but lower than any of the four inner planets. The average distance between Jupiter and the Sun is 778 million km (about 5.2 times the average distance from the Earth to the Sun, or 5.2 AU) and it completes an orbit every 11.86 years.

Jupiter's apparent magnitude is approximately -2.27 which means this celestial body is one of the brightest objects in the evening sky other than our moon. Its cloud bands or Latitudes are visible even when using a 40mm eyepiece. One can visually make out its creme and brown cloud patterns. I took the picture above using a Barlow 2x lense coupled with a 10mm eyepiece/digital camera (Starshoot SS Camera II 1.3mp). On this evening Jupiter's four Galilean moons were in view: Europa, Ganymede, Callisto and Io (not pictured).

Some info provided by Wikipedia

Sunday, November 2, 2008

M31 - Andromeda Galaxy

Date: 10/30/08
Time: 8:00pm-10:15pm CST
Weather: Clear with 15-20mph winds - Temp: 47 degrees (F)
Location: Port Barrington, IL

In the Constellation Andromeda, I enjoyed the vastness of M31 (Andromeda Galaxy), a spiral galaxy that looked like a glowing fuzzy oval sphere. I used a 5mm eyepiece and found that it was too much magnification and found better luck with a 10mm eyepiece. I was unable to find M110 or M32 and will attempt again on a darker night. M31 is an amazing 2.2 million light years away and is comprised of as many as 160 million stars.

I did find a fuzzy globular image within the viewfinder that was very close in relation to M31. My first conclusion was that it was M110 but it appeared too remote from M31. My next assumption was that it might be M33 yet it seemed closer than what is illustrated on my star maps. I will attempt another look to confirm or deny these notes.

I enjoyed the M103 Open Cluster in Cassiopeia about 8000 light years away and M15 (Pegasus Cluster), a Globular Cluster found between the constellations of Pegasus and Equuleus. I viewed M57, the Ringed Nebula found in Lyra near the Star of Vega. M57 is about 4100 light years away from Earth. I could just make out the inner dark center of the ring. All of these objects were viewed first using a 25mm eyepiece and then upgrading to a 10mm eyepiece. In many cases zooming in with the 5mm eyepiece was too much magnification and clearly brightness was lost when viewing the objects.

I got the full view of M45, the Pleiades Star Cluster using a 40mm eyepiece. I clearly made out 6 bright stars and two semi bright stars which were clearly the focal point of this impressive cluster. M45 is about 400 light years away.

Saturday, November 1, 2008

Messier Objects

My goal is to photograph to the best of my ability with the equipment afforded to me, all solar system objects applicable. Also, my main goal over the next couple years is to catalog all Messier Objects.

The Messier objects are a set of astronomical objects first listed by French astronomer Charles Messier in his "Catalogue des Nébuleuses et des Amas d'Étoiles" ("Catalogue of Nebulae and Star Clusters") included in the Connaissance des Temps for 1774 (published in 1771). The original motivation of the catalogue was that Messier was a comet hunter, and was frustrated by objects which resembled but were not comets. He therefore compiled a list of these objects in collaboration with his assistant Pierre Méchain. notes from Wikipedia.com

I will be cataloging and hand sketching all Messier objects as well as NGC and IC images, noting date, time, seeing conditions, telescope aperature, magnification and a short description including location.

Friday, October 31, 2008

Orion SkyQuest XT10 Intelliscope with Object Locator REVIEW


This is a consumer review for the latest model of the Orion SkyQuest XT10 Intelliscope with Object Locator. This review is targeted to first time buyers of telescopes or for people who are looking to upgrade to the next level. If you have already shopped for a new telescope, you probably noticed that there are many choices out in the market place. There are several telescopes in the $400-$450 range that have the full “GoTo” technology for star navigation and tracking. The problem is the typical aperture for these scopes ranges from 4” to 5” wide. Celestron and Meade both have very nice telescopes that fall into this range. As we all learn when shopping for a new telescope, aperture is the most important aspect to a scope as it is all about the light gathering capability then followed by optics and magnification. As many have seen, refractor telescopes tend to be too expensive for first time buyers. Then there are the Dobsonian mounted Reflector versions that by far give the consumer the most aperture for the buck – by far! The SkyQuest XT10 Dobsonian telescope sells for about $670 with the “Object Locator”. That is more than double the aperture for only a couple hundred dollars more. If you are serious about viewing deep space objects, then the larger aperture is a must!

The SkyQuest XT10 has a nice 10” “light bucket” aperture with an equally impressive 47” focal length. The Focal Ratio is 4.7 which is great to see objects as dim as 13 to 14 magnitude. This telescope comes with parabolic optics which includes a primary and secondary mirror as well as two Sirius Possl 25mm and 10mm eye pieces. This telescope also includes a large view finder scope and new 2” Crayford focuser. Then you have the option to purchase the telescope with the “Object Locator” which advertises the capability to track 14,000 celestial objects with push button ease. Orion included a new base and mount design that appears to have addressed previous balancing and jerking problems (per older reviews).

I purchased the SkyQuest XT10 with the object locator. I ordered online from Telescope.com and my telescope as well as several accessories shipped the next day Fedex ground. In less than a week two boxes carrying the telescope arrived at my front door. Orion packages the telescopes very well and everything was in good shape upon delivery.

You do have to assemble the base of the Dobsonian mount which includes some small circuit boards for the altitude and azimuth encoders (important for the object locator). I am one of those people that do not excel at assembling things like desks, furniture, etc. I always seem to screw it up and in many cases assemble it wrong. Fortunately, in this case, I took my time and re-read the instructions as I slowly assembled the telescope. I find that I am a visual person so the directions could have had more pictures through the step by step process – never the less, if you take your time and carefully read the instructions, you should have no problems assembling this scope. If I can do it, you can do it. The telescope tube assembly with the mirrors, view finder and eyepiece holder is already assembled and ready to go!

There is a hidden feature on the Object Locator controller that allows you to conduct several tests to see that the encoders are working properly. I would suggest running those tests as they help in confirming that you assembled everything correctly. Also, collimating the telescope proved challenging at first but once I played with it, eventually I got the hang of calibrating the mirrors to the eyepiece. I found the Collimation cap that was included with the telescope to be more helpful than the laser collimator that I bought separately.

I first played with the telescope during the day, calibrating the view finder to the eyepiece and in general just reading through the entire instruction manual. On my maiden voyage in the dark, I struggled at first finding the correct bright stars to use for the two star alignment procedure which will calibrate the object locator and scope with the night sky. I strongly suggest you learn the constellations and alpha stars (brightest stars) so that you can easily use Orion’s included calibration star maps with ease. If you are not familiar with the night sky, you will have some difficulty finding the correct stars to make a successful alignment. Once I did align my new scope to two bright starts of my choice, I was impressed with the accuracy of the alignment. I could punch in M31 and the scope would direct me to the field of view for that Messier object. Infact, using the 25mm eyepiece first, I found that objects where in or on the edge of the field of view of the eyepiece. It was too easy!. I have read in other reviews that people had trouble with alignment and calibrating the object locator and scope to the night sky. Clearly you need to assemble the scope correctly and make sure the encoders are working correctly. The scope needs to be in collimation and you need to center the CORRECT stars in the field of view using the 10mm eyepiece. Then, only then will you enjoy almost pin point accuracy.

I found that the Starry Night software that is included is helpful indoors but too cumbersome outside. The object locator is really all you need. Though you can track the night sky also using your lab top and Starry Night, it appears they did not include a night vision filter so your eyes will be blinded by the bright interface. Other versions of Starry Night appear to have more bells and whistles and the Orion version that comes with your telescope is a bare bones version. It is still helpful for printing star maps to take outside and or learning more about what is in the sky above. It is still worth exploring but needs to be upgraded for better use ($225.00 upgrade!)

For the value of this scope, coupled with its impressive aperture and object locator, I am more than satisfied with my purchase. Last night I viewed a handful of Messier objects with ease. As with anything, it takes some getting used to for optimal operation, but once you spend a few hours successfully navigating and viewing the heavens above, the SkyQuest XT10 telescope quickly pays for itself. I strongly recommend this telescope to anyone just getting into observational astronomy or looking to upgrade to a better telescope without breaking the bank.

Friday, October 17, 2008

Expectations




I currently live in the far northwest suburbs of Chicago. I actually live much closer to the Wisconsin border than the Chicago downtown area putting my vantage point about 45 miles NW from the Michigan lakefront and less than 20 miles south of the WI state line. With the exception of small villages and towns, I live in farm country which means the overall light pollution is minimal. Excluding a couple annoying street lights, my neighborhood is relatively dark at night – a plus for observational astronomy.

My expectations are many though simple in nature: I am interested in avidly pursuing amateur observational astronomy from my backyard and on camping trips on a regular basis. From my backyard, I have about a ½ acre of grass with various views that will give me close to a 360 degree vantage point to the heavens above. Younger trees will give way to accessible horizons and dark nights should give way to better views of space and time.

I am awaiting a new Orion SkyQuest XT10 IntelliScope with Object Locator. With a 250mm aperture and a focal length of 1200mm, I should be able to enjoy deep space objects up to 14.7 stellar magnitude. Though I am very interested in navigating the constellations to find objects on my own accord, I am happy to have a semi automated computer software assisted object locator to help when it becomes difficult to find a specific object. Using software from Starry Night Pro and my Dell laptop, I will have access to over 14,000 celestial objects.

I look forward to the hobby of searching out and cataloging objects from the NGC, IC and Messier catalogs as well as other essential viewing items like local planets and binary star systems. I look forward to attempting to map out portions of our moon and tracking the satellites of Jupiter. Using sketch books and colored pencils, I will sketch the images I find noting the time, place and tools used to observe a particular object. When appropriate, I will photograph, using short exposures, celestial objects like the lunar surface, planets and other objects if possible. Though I will be keeping a separate written journal of my observations, I intend to update this blog when possible with pertinent and noteworthy information.

Thursday, October 16, 2008

Introduction




As a young child, I was always interested and even enthralled in Astronomy. My childhood room was decorated with rocket ships and space shuttle models, pictures and books of the celestial heavens above. As a young teenager, I owned my first telescope: I believe it was an inexpensive refractor with maybe a 3” aperture; really only good to view the moon and a few planets. Yet, never disappointed, I pointed that little telescope all over the heavens looking for shooting stars, satellites and distinctions in star color.

In college, I took courses in Astronomy including Beginning Astronomy, Advanced Astronomy and also an Observational Astronomy lab all of which continued to fuel my appetite. Later in college I began experimenting with primitive astrophotography, taking short exposures of planets, the moon and an occasional lunar eclipse.

Now, in the present, after marriage and child, my love for Astronomy has been rekindled. It took a recent camping trip up in central Wisconsin to bring my interest back full circle. One of our camping companions hauled his impressive 10” homemade telescope to the campsite. Despite a rather hazy and overcast couple of nights, the views of Jupiter were amazing. We looked at a binary star system and peeked in at the Pleiades Star Cluster. I was hooked again.

For really no ones pleasure but mine, I introduce The Celestial Chronicle; An Amateur Observational Astronomy Journal. My goal is to begin slowly cataloging the many amazing objects that reveal themselves in the night sky including celestial bodies to deep space objects.